CONTEXT
Burnside
is arguably the most significant street in Portland. It divides north
from south, and on the west side of the river, draws the line that
shifts downtown's street orientation. Also on the west side, it
generally acts as an edge (not necessarily a bad thing), serving as a
boundary that helps to form four distinct city districts from 23rd to
the river.
On
the east side of the river, Burnside is somewhat less dramatic. Between
the river and Sandy (although it still divides north from south)
Burnside neither shifts the street grid nor touches four different
districts. Rather, Burnside flows through the Central Eastside
Industrial District only, primarily acting as a conduit for commuters
traveling back and forth from downtown to Sandy.
Portland's
Office of Transportation is currently examining Burnside between NW 23rd
and Sandy. The office and their consultant team have come up with a set
of urban design alternatives to help the city rethink the character of
Burnside. One of their alternatives suggests treating East Burnside
between the river and Sandy like the other streets that feed bridges
from the eastside (for example, Hawthorne-Madison, Belmont-Morrison).
This would involve redeveloping Burnside, in conjunction with NE Couch,
as a couplet system. Burnside would serve one-way traffic eastbound from
the bridge to Sandy, while Couch would serve the opposite condition:
westbound traffic from Sandy to Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (MLK),
and then on to the bridge and into downtown.
One
of the more significant results of the couplet alternative would be the
complete redesign (and rationalization) of the critical Central City
gateway intersection at Burnside, 12th, and Sandy. Routing westbound
traffic onto Couch could potentially free up a "superblock"-size
development parcel, most of which is currently in public right-of-way.
The parcel would definitely become a "signature site" -- a
fairly sizable building at this location would be clearly visible to
traffic on both Burnside and Sandy westbound from quite a distance out.
Additionally, those within a building here would be treated to fantastic
views in almost every direction, not the least of which is a
simultaneous view east down both Burnside and Sandy.
Our
proposal for the Block 76 signature site responds to the preceding
analysis. In addition, our proposal suggests building on the city's
successes with pro-active land-use planning and mutually beneficial
public-private partnerships.
Our
proposal would have the city set a bold new precedent.
SITE
We
have chosen to expand the parameters of the design brief to include a
portion of Block 67 (partially owned by the PDC) as the location for the
new office development. The intent of this expansion is to affect as
much of the surrounding area as possible. This is done not only through
new building and landscaping, but also by extending NE Couch Street
across block 67 and connecting it with NE 2nd Avenue. This will have the
effect of increasing the number of access points to the site as well as
enhancing the commercial potential of the area.
Overall
our proposal:
1.
Creates a “superblock”-size parcel at the Burnside Bridge gateway;
2.
Provides a counterpoint to the potential superblock development at the
Burnside/Sandy/12th intersection;
3.
Exposes more Central City workers to the art of skateboarding; and
4.
Creates an improved pedestrian connection to the Eastbank Esplande from
the westbound-side of the Burnside Bridge.
DESIGN
On
the south western end of Block 67 we have located a tower measuring
almost 320' high and containing 100,000 sf of office space. Although it
exceeds the maximum height limit allowed for this area, we feel an
exception is in order. This
tall and slender tower would help to restore some significant
architectural presence to a site that is dominated by transportation
infrastructure. It would also serve as a beacon for the area as well as
bookending any future development occurring at the Burnside/Sandy/12th
intersection.
A
skybridge spanning NE 3rd Avenue links the tower to the building on
Block 76. This building, which contains the remainder of the office
program as well as 45,000 sf of light industrial space, also holds four
levels of underground parking. The total square footage allocated to
parking amounts to 120,000 sf, an amount that is more than adequate for
those using the development.
The
building on Block 76 stands in stark contrast to the fin tower on block
67. It serves as an anchor, so to speak, for the composition. In one
sense, the tower is as light and fragile as a kite, constrained from
leaving the ground by a line that stretches back to the anchor that
occupies all of Block 76. This sense of movement is further accentuated
by the east-west orientation of both the fin tower and the anchor
building, which seem to reach out toward the river.
ENVIRONMENT
AND TECHNOLOGY
The
site and its close proximity to the Burnside Bridge encourage an
east-west alignment of both the fin tower and the anchor building. The
long facades of each building are oriented north-south, the two most
desirable outlooks from a heating, cooling and lighting standpoint for
any building. Each outlook, though, requires a different solution. For
the south façade, the most favored side in a predominantly overcast
environment, it is nevertheless important that adequate provision be
given to sunscreen devices. On the north side, where glare and heat gain
are less of an issue, it makes sense to locate the majority of the core
services - elevators, toilets, and stairs - along this part of the
building. What is left exposed should open up to as much daylight as
possible, taking advantage of the diffuse natural lighting afforded from
a northern exposure.
Going
hand in hand with the issue of solar orientation, are the issues of
energy use and materials. Both buildings are constructed of steel,
glass, and masonry. Where there is glass, which is true for most of the
tower and a good portion of the anchor building, a multiple glass skin
system is employed. An air space of 12" is established between the
glass skins as a means of creating an insulative layer against
temperature extremes as well as noise, while still allowing for maximum
daylight. At the same time, the lighting system would be linked to
motion sensors, and throughout the complex the light bulbs would consist
entirely of energy efficient bulbs. Solar panels on the roofs of both
buildings, each taking advantage of the generous southern exposure,
provide further energy savings. |